Of
Domestic Duties
William
Gouge, 1622
Section
6.25. Of Parents' Too Much Lavishness and
Indulgency Upon Their Children.
Lavishness
Contrary 2. Others surpass as much
in the excesses, feeding them too
daintily: attiring them too garishly: tending them too cockeringly: and letting
them spend too much time in sport and play. Many and great are the mischiefs
that follow thereupon: as—
1.
They who are in their childhood daintily fed, and too much pampered, besides
that for the most part they are most sickly, they will in time grow so
squeamish, and choice of meats, as their parents shall not know what to provide
for them, or when to give it them: The
full soul loatheth an honeycomb: [Prov 27:7] yea if a
stranger comes to the table, where such a child sits, he may soon observe that
he has been too daintily fed. If at first children be fed with ordinary
moderate diet, they will afterwards both be in better health and liking, and
also more contentedly, and thankfully accept whatsoever shall be provided for them.
But excess breeds diseases both in body and mind.
2.
Vanity in apparel does also much corrupt young children: for there is in them
even from the cradle a natural disposition to outward bravery: now for parents
to prank them up, what is it but to blow up the fire of that vanity, and make
it arise into such a flame as in time may much scorch the parents themselves,
and utterly consume the children: and yet how usual a fault is this? how
monstrously do many parents offend therein? what foolish fashion is used of the
greatest swaggerers, and lightest strumpets, which they will not bring their
children unto, and that when their children are not able to discern between
stuffs or colors? what can this proclaim but parents' pride and folly? Proud
maids are many times the instruments of pranking up children (especially
when they are little ones) more than is meet: but yet the blame lies on parents
for suffering it.
3.
Tending children too cockishly makes them too long children, and too tender:
and often alters a good constitution of body. Some are so overmuch tender of
their children, as if a child never so little complain, or refuse the meat
(though for daintiness or fullness) the physician must presently be sent for,
and the apothecary sent unto, and the child with supposed and apish kindness
made much worse.
4.
Too much sport makes them wild, rude, unfit to be trained up to any good
calling, and spends their spirits, and wastes their strength too much. Yet many
parents care not how much time their children spend in sport, and how little in
learning: they think it dulls their children too much to be held to school, or
to any learning: whereas indeed too much play infatuates them more, and
learning would much sharpen their wits.
Indulgency.
Contrary
to this duty of correcting are two extremes.
1.
Too much lenity.
2.
Too much severity.
Many
so cocker their children, as they will suffer them to run into any misdemeanor,
rather than correct them. They cannot endure to hear their children cry: and
therefore their children must be pleased in all their humours and evil
desires. These parents bring shame to themselves, and mischief upon their
children: for God is often forced to correct such. Heavy are God's corrections:
and often light on parent and child both: as appears by the judgments on Eli
and his sons: for such parents make themselves accessory to their children's
sins: yea also to the judgments laid upon their children. God says of such
parents, that they honour their children
above God. [1 Sam 2:29] It is therefore a fond indulgency
which makes parents regard neither God's honor, nor their own or children's
safety.
Mothers
for the most part offend herein, who are so far from performing this duty
themselves, as they are much offended with their husbands if they do it. And to
proclaim their folly to all the world, they cannot commit their children to a
tutor or schoolmaster, but with a straight charge, that they correct them not.
Objection 1. Correction makes
children sots and blocks.
Answer. If God's spirit deserve to
have more credence than such foolish women, that objection is most false, for
we heard before [see Section 46] how correction gives wisdom, and drives out
foolishness. [Prov 22:15]
Objection 2. Mothers may be the more
born with herein, because with long trouble they did bear, and with great
travail bring forth their children.
Answer. That may be a good motive
for them to seek the true good of their children, that so their trouble and
travail may not be in vain: but not to uphold them in the broad way that leads
to destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment